RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04029
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His final Permissive Temporary Duty (PTDY) dates be corrected
to reflect 28 Nov 11 to 27 Dec 11.
2. His terminal leave dates be corrected to reflect 28 Dec 11 to
31 Dec 11.
3. Any excess leave be sold back to the Air Force based on the
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam (JBPHH), Hawaii rates.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Finance was unable to correct his PTDY and terminal leave dates
because his finance records were inactive.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF
IMTs 988, Leave Request/Authorization, and a memorandum dated
22 Mar 12..
The applicants complete submission, with attachments is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in
the Regular Air Force on 3 Dec 85 and retired from active duty,
effective 1 Jan 12.
According to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
records, the applicant was on PTDY from 21 Nov 11 through 20 Dec
11 and was charged terminal leave from 21 Dec 11 through 31 Dec
11.
On 30 Oct 12, AFPC/DPSIM requested additional documentation from
the applicant, specifically, a letter signed by his squadron
commander stating his PTDY and terminal leave dates were changed
prior to retirement due to operational mission requirements.
In a letter dated 16 Jul 13, the Air Force Board for Correction of
Military Records (AFBCMR) administratively closed the applicants
case because he did not indicate how he wanted his PTDY and
terminal leave dates corrected. The AFBCMR also advised that he
had not provided adequate source documents (i.e., AF Form 988)
that would aid the Board in surmising his request.
On 7 Nov 13, the applicant resubmitted his application and
provided two AF IMTs 988 and a letter from his unit indicating the
change to his PTDY and terminal leave dates were due to
administrative duties in his workplace.
According to the AF IMT 988, dated 18 Nov 11, his PTDY started on
28 Nov 11 and ended on 27 Dec 11.
According to the AF IMT 988, dated 18 Nov 11, his terminal leave
started on 28 Dec 11 and ended on 31 Dec 11.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval. Finance is responsible for
processing PTDY in conjunction with terminal leave. The
applicants finance office has acknowledged the administrative
error.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 25 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Having carefully reviewed
this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale
expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has
been the victim of either an error or an injustice. As a result
of the recommended corrections to his record, he will be paid for
seven days of leave based on the JBPHHs rate as requested.
Therefore, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as
indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. His Permissive Temporary Duty (PTDY) dates in conjunction
with his retirement, effective 1 January 2012, be corrected to
reflect 28 November 2011 through 27 December 2011.
b. His terminal leave dates in conjunction with his
retirement, effective 1 January 2012, be corrected to reflect
28 December 2011 through 31 December 2011.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2012-04029 in Executive Session on 30 Sep 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 28 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jan 13.
3
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03925
This extension was completed, signed, and approved in Mar 2009; however, the local personnel office said they could not update the system until 1 Dec 2009, which was the first day of her extension. In this regard, we note that DPSIM initially recommended disapproval of the applicants request; however, after reviewing the extension paperwork, DPSIM now recommends 17.5 days of leave be restored to her leave account and we agree. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02851
The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS states they support DPSOAs recommendation for approval based on the applicant not being provided the opportunity to request withdrawal of his separation request. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPSIM states commanders are the approval authority for terminal leave and do not normally allow members to return to duty after leave begins. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01333
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00768
If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00670
On 27 Apr 12, he sent a letter stating the only document he had was the AF IMT 988, Leave Request/Authorization, for his permissive TDY and terminal leave. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial stating the governing instructions state that the member...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02880
In a letter dated 7 Apr 14, the applicants Primary Care Manager (PCM) stated that it was evident that the Synthroid regimen was being adjusted when the applicant failed her now one remaining FA failure on the AC measure. The complete FAAB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for removal of her referral EPR for the period through 16 Jun 11. In this respect, we note the applicant provides a letter dated 7 Apr 14, from her PCM...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00449
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00449 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirty days of lost leave be reinstated. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04876
Then, she was on convalescent leave and in rehabilitation until 17 Sep 11, and not permitted to leave the local area due to her medical condition. The applicant lost 16 days of leave because her extensive convalescent leave and rehabilitation precluded her from taking ordinary leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03436
On 21 February 2003, the applicant applied for ten days of PTDY from 25 February to 6 March 2003 and for Terminal Leave from 7 March to 18 May 2003 and the leave was approved as evidenced by AF Form 988’s. Her original request for PTDY and Terminal Leave were on separate AF Form 988’s for ten days PTDY (leave approved by the commander but not debited against the leave account) from 25 February to 6 March 2003, and for 73 days of Terminal Leave from 7 March to 18 May 2003. After careful...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02229
He should have been allowed 42-90 days to complete a FA after his recommended release date. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. The AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, submitted by the applicant is noted; however, in the absence of the fitness assessment scoresheet, fitness...